3.13.2012

What if the Zoo Hypothesis Was Real?


By on 10:13 PM


If our eventual destruction/enslavement at the hands of imperialistic aliens is the worst possible answer to the Fermi Paradox, the Zoo Hypothesis is the most horrifying. Horror movies capitalize on the suspense in the feeling of being watched, and very little can make you feel as vulnerable or panicky as the creepifying feeling that there’s someone right behind you, watching your every move.

And just think: that’s with a human as the villain – maybe someone crazy, maybe someone in a mask, and very possibly someone stronger, faster, and better armed than you. Movies and books branch out into the realm of monsters and ghosts, but at the end of the day – regardless of how much our irrational mind imagines all sorts of horrible creatures and ghouls in our blind spots – there’s some small sort of comfort in the repeated thought of ‘monsters aren’t real.’
In a universe with extra-terrestrials, however, that lifeline we cling to might no longer be available. The law of averages has to count for something: not all aliens would be physically terrifying, not all would be out to study or dominate us, and not all would even be our intellectual and technological equals or superiors. But some just might be. And if even they’re out there doing something as relatively benign as what the Zoo Hypothesis describes, that’s still plenty of terror to work with. 

What is the Zoo Hypothesis exactly? It’s one possible answer to Enrico Fermi’s frustrated question from over 50 years ago: if there are aliens out there in the universe, why haven’t we found any evidence yet?

There have been countless responses to this. They range from the boring and standard – ‘there aren’t any aliens’ and ‘if there are aliens, the universe is so mind-bogglingly huge that any conclusive evidence will never reach us’ –  to the anthropomorphic: aliens die out before we’re aware of them, either due to war or from attempting to master forces like nuclear energy that they couldn’t control. The Zoo Hypothesis says aliens are watching us and studying us, carefully keeping from us any signs of their existence so their observations can continue unimpeded. 

And, really, that’s one of the scariest mind-fucks I’ve ever heard of... and that’s including the possibility that, with the multiverse and alternate dimensions in mind, there’s a world in which Sarah Palin became the president of the United States.

Of course, what makes it even scarier is through applying a couple of anthropomorphisms myself:

Undisturbed observation isn’t what we do. It’s just not – not even in actual zoos. Undisturbed observations can happen in zoos on Earth, yes, in the entertainment portion of the whole set-up. (And if this fairly innocent idea doesn’t creep the hell out of you, boy do I have a book you need to read.) So, in zoos of humans, I suppose some environments can continue on as facsimiles of original societies, but then there are the metaphorical bratty children and adults that would tap on the glass, feed us things they’re not supposed, and eventually throw rocks at us. There might even be a crazy alien or two that would make us aware of our imprisoned state and release us – violent, terrified, and not just a little bit ruffled in outrage – into the galaxy at large, where we would be summarily hunted down and killed for being menaces like so many wildcats or snakes.

None of those scenarios were what I initially had in mind, though, now that I‘ve imagined them, they seem particularly hideous and awful, too. No, what I was originally thinking about was the science side of animal captivity. We experiment; we introduce foreign variables to see the reaction on the environment and social structure; we test various chemicals and lobotomies. And when we’re done, we dissect or start some new experiment. When we don’t get the results we wanted, we cut the funding. 

This isn’t an off-shoot of using aliens as a medium for change, either. I’m not saying we should stop animal testing everywhere and in all forms… well, I am a little. Mostly I’m just saying that if we do experiment on animals with the justification that they’re more expendable than humans, we shouldn’t be too indignant if a superior alien race is of a similar mind.

Of course, now that I think about the original topic – zoos – those sorts of science-based situations are not a particularly novel brand of horror. Human experimentation has been done – especially in all sorts of nonfiction, real world applications. We’ve all heard about the Stanford Prison experiment or Stanley Milgram’s experiment that fairly concretely showed the average person to be a bit weak and terrible, willing to electrify someone to death if an authority figure says so. 



We also have Mengele’s testing on prisoners in concentration camps to keep in mind, as well as the Tuskegee syphilis experiment by American doctors. Human experimentation is reprehensible, but we know this. It’s known with rather horrible clarity and on the basis of a lot of evidence and examples. It, at its core, doesn’t have the mysteriousness that can creep on our imaginations. Books, several books, can be made about these ideas, but it doesn’t have the immediate and unexpectedly visceral conflict of the darker underbelly of a human zoo.

There are just so many elements for rising horror, it’s almost like a plot isn’t necessary. We know that animals in captivity adjust to accept their imprisonment – comfortably if the conditions are right, eventually even if they’re not. It’s not a far stretch of the imagination to see humans doing the same thing, even before the last generation of once-free humans dies out. But, in a typical zoo, the animals know about their situation to some degree – they know they’re surrounded by humans, at the very least. It’s the examples of when we want to make sure the animals can be reintroduced to the wild that are most like what an actualized Zoo Hypothesis may be like. Every so often there’s a viral image of baby pandas being fed by keepers in panda costumers, the idea being that pandas won’t become dependent on interactions with humans, and will spend the whole time thinking they’ve just been around other pandas. These photos are always followed by comments of how cute the whole set-up is.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com
Next step: people suits.


Apply it to the Zoo Hypothesis, and suddenly it’s not cute anymore – it’s an image that just might keep you up at night. 


If you have a question, a worse possibility in mind, or just something to say, please be sure to leave a comment below! 


Rachel is the co-founder of How To Survive Alien Invasion Novels, and spends her time writing, studying, and reading what would probably considered far too many books. Connect with her and Rusty on Twitter and Facebook, and click here to read more of her articles about alien theories and how to survive alien invasion novels.

About Syed Faizan Ali

Faizan is a 17 year old young guy who is blessed with the art of Blogging,He love to Blog day in and day out,He is a Website Designer and a Certified Graphics Designer.

2 comments:

  1. Haha, nice! I wonder about these things myself, quite a bit more than would be considered healthy I guess.

    Your last concept is cool, about the pandas. Awesome :) I'd like to step it up and generalize the animal zoo situation a bit if you don't mind.

    In trying to visualize the ignorance of a bunch of penguins in an enclosure I like to think of us in ancient times, the people of old saw stars, they saw weather, they felt gravity, but they had absolutely no friggin' clue what's going on.

    In some cases, like a solar eclipse, it totally stumped and consumed them. It's like a (humanized thought-experiment-)penguin watching a door, people pass in and out of it, but for some reason they just don't get it, for them it must absurd: "What kind of black magic is this?". The human equivalent would perhaps be unidentifiable blobs of intelligence just moving into your living room through the wall and giving you hot meals.

    It's blindness doesn't stem from the lack of a visual sense, it's intellectual blindness, they don't even wonder about it. Effectively enclosing an organism without it knowing too much about it boils down to providing enough illusion and adequate complexity so it's impossible for it to figure it out on it's own.

    If you thought I was going off a tangent before, I'm going to properly leave you in my rear-view-mirror now. How do you contain humans? Provide them with a world to inhabit, something they would call, like say, a universe. They could spent countless centuries traveling to their precious stars as they would call it. The penguin equivalent being figuring out a way to walk to a neighboring penguin-enclosure.

    Our hypothetical super-mega-ultra-aliens, conjuring up what we call 'universes' would be like us conjuring up zoos. They are just capable of it and just like a bunch of chimps in a zoo we have absolutely no clue how that would be possible. In fact, we don't even give it much thought, we are deeply blind to the possibility itself.

    Do penguins understand we are their superiors? Try your hardest to visualize their ignorance. How can they understand us, our abilities, our tools, both mental and physical, if they don't possess them themselves. Everything would be compared to a penguin. We might be considered ugly-as-fuck-penguins-that-move-funny-but-throw-food, perhaps even considered inferior. Haha, they lack the ability to even come up with the idea that they are not superior, how would they know? We don't have penguin-abilities, we are friggin' useless to them.

    I find it interesting and curious we are 'top-species' and don't have anything above us. Could it be, just maybe, that they are right in front of us, but we just fundamentally lack the ability to understand their superiority? For us, everything is ugly-as-fuck-humans (aliens) or below that. Maybe we are the fucking penguins.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ooh, I like that idea - that the entire universe might have been created for humanity, the big bang and all. Merely enclosing us on a world may have worked until the 20th century, but I think we'd have easily figured that out by now. I wonder if the universe is even escapable? Might they let us out someday to run free throughout the multiverse?

    ReplyDelete